What is “Shareholder Activism”?
Shareholder activism, also known as active ownership, is an approach in which an individual or most commonly an institution can use its stake in a company to influence a corporation’s behavior. With the rising focus on Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) issues, shareholder activism has increased significantly over recent years.
Although minority shareholders do not have hands-on experience in running the day-to-day business of the company, being active shareholders by writing proposals to the senior management, voting, and taking part in annual general meetings are just a few of the tools they have at their disposal that can trigger the desired change of direction.
Key Learning Points
- Shareholder activism is a strategy in which shareholders of a company can influence its management to make changes.
- Typically, this approach is taken up by minority shareholders of a publicly-traded company, who use a variety of tactics to exert pressure on its management.
- The reasons for such a strategy could vary broadly and some could include adopting more environmentally friendly policies or increased support and fair treatment of employees.
- Some of the mechanisms that active shareholders can use to influence the direction of travel for the business include engagement with its management and organizing voting campaigns.
Institutional investors are one of the most common types of shareholder activists. They are usually a pension fund, mutual fund, or insurance company, and have long-term interest in the company in question. They could hold a large share of the business and therefore a higher level of influence over the management. Hedge funds and even individual investors could also use their rights and try to initiate change.
Approaches to Shareholder Activism
Shareholder engagement is a relatively soft approach in which shareholders in the company engage with the company’s management to discuss their concerns and suggest changes. This strategy also relies on building long-term relationships with the company’s leadership.
Voting campaigns are often employed by institutional investors and are an efficient way to influence the management of the business. In essence, this approach encourages other shareholders to withhold votes or vote against certain proposals by the board of a company. For example, shareholders might not be happy with excessive executive pay and could vote against it. Even if not successful, this sends a clear message to the management that shareholders are not happy and could potentially even divest from the company.
Proxy contests are an aggressive approach of shareholder activism in which shareholders could attempt to replace the company’s board members in order to trigger an internal change. This type is often employed by hedge funds and is typically settled with an agreement in which the company gives up a seat on the board. These are also known as “proxy fights” and can be very costly for the business.
Implications for Individual Investors
As individual investors have more restricted access to the company’s management and usually their vote is not as significant as the vote of institutions, they will often need to join forces in order to succeed. However, they can still benefit from the changes that institutions trigger within the organization and it is essential to remain informed on the recent events involving all stakeholders.